例句與造句

1. So it made a TEC article 234 reference ( now article 267 ) to the European Court of Justice.
2. Under Article 234 of the agreement, the European Court of Justice handles dispute resolution between CARIFORUM and European Union states.
3. Within the agreement under Article 234, the European Court of Justice also carries dispute resolution mechanisms between CARIFORUM and the European Union states.
4. Petitions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling are described in Article 267 ( ex Article 234 ) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
5. Finally, all files were placed together in a sealed packet; the sealed packet was then signed by every member of the Directing Committee, and any party representative who so desired ( article 234 ).
6. It's difficult to find article 234 in a sentence. 用article 234造句挺難的
7. On 14 January 2013, upon the imposition of Governor's Rule following the January 2013 Pakistan bombings, Raisani was dismissed as Chief Minister by the Prime Minister of Pakistan, under Article 234 of the Constitution of Pakistan.
8. The House was, in any event, obliged to request a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC ( now Article 267 TFEU post-Lisbon Treaty ) which obliges courts " against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law " to make a reference.
9. Short of that, he said, " all my legal possibilities ended yesterday . . . Legally there is no other way to reverse this situation . " The electoral court declared that Lugo had been duly removed from office under Article 225, and that Federico Franco had correctly succeeded as President under Article 234.
10. ""'Nordsee Deutsche Hochseefischerei GmbH v Reederei Mond Hochseefischerei Nordstern AG & Co KG " "'is a case referred to the European Court of Justice ( ECJ ) by a German arbitrator by virtue of Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( formerly Article 234 of the Treaty establishing the European Community ).
11. This article gives the " Courts or Tribunals " of Member States the power to refer matters involving the interpretation or application of European Union law to the ECJ . It was held in this case that the ECJ could not rule on questions referred to it by an arbitrator because an arbitral body is not a court or tribunal of a Member State as defined in Article 234.
12. Thereupon Shield Mark appealed to the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, the highest civil court of the Netherlands, which decided to stay proceedings and to refer two questions to the European Court of Justice under Article 234 EC for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 2 of First Council Directive 89 / 104 / EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks.